Igen igen er EU fårene ude med riven. Det er, ifølge lav-intelligens gruppens selvvalgte talsmænd, forkasteligt at man ikke med det samme sætter en dato på en afstemning om euroen. Det begrænser Danmark, og alle de seneste meningsmålinger tyder på at 4 ud af 10 danskere siger ja til euroen. Senest fremsættes disse anti-demokratiske tanker af Landsformand for Europabevægelsen, Erik Boel. Selvfølgelig er det demokratisk at lade ham have sin mening, sammen med de sikkert hundreder af medlemmer af Europabevægelsen. Men det er da godt nok mangel på respekt for demokratiet at sige at vi skal stemme om euroen. Erik Skoevl, vi har stemt. 2 gange, i teorien. Er det ikke nok? Insisterer du på at håne denne demokratiske proces fordi du er ond, fordi du er dum, eller fordi du bare generelt er anti-demokratisk? Jeg øjner ikke andre muligheder end de ovenstående, for din mangel på respekt for andres meninger er tankevækkende.
Jeg har egentligt ikke ret til at kalde dig hverken dum eller ond, for jeg kender dig ikke (og har heller intet ønske om det). Men jeg tager mig retten til det, når du på denne måde, med læserbreve i aviser, håner mine demokratiske rettigheder, og udtrykker foragt for mine demokratiske beslutninger. Hvor er det lige grænsen går? I Afghanistan sender vi soldaterne ned for, med politikernes tidligere ord, at skabe demokrati. Skal vi sætte hæren ind mod Europabevægelsen? Skal vi tvinge jer til at respektere demokratiet?
Nej, selvfølgelig skal vi ikke det, men når en marginaliseret ekstremist-organisation håner det danske demokrati så er det en del af mine rettigheder at kunne ringeagte selvsamme organisation. Hvilket jeg gør.
Erik Skoevl/Boel eller hvad du nu vil kaldes : Hvis du er så forhippet på en ny afstemning om euroen, kunne du så ikke forklare folk hvad der gør at der, demokratisk set, skulle være behov for en ny afstemning? Samt om denne begrundelse ville blive aktuel igen hvis det endte med et ja til euroen? Altså, hvis begrundelsen er X, og der stemmes ja på grund af X, vil du så også kræve ny afstemning om euroen næste gang X optræder? Nej vel? Demokrati er jo, i disse demokrati-hadende ekstremist-organisationers øjne, kun nyttigt til man opnår sit mål, så kan demokratiet fjernes. Det leder tankerne hen på en mand der i 30’erne vandt et valg (jeg husker ikke navnet, men det var vist i Tyskland), hvorpå der ikke længere var grund til at afholde frie valg, for nu havde denne mand jo opnået alt hvad demokrati kunne give ham.
Jeg sammenligner bestemt ikke Erik Skoevl med denne mand, som kunne forføre en nation, men jeg sammenligner deres respektive mangel på respekt for demokratiske afgørelser.
.
.
.
And yet again, the Pigs of Democracy of the European Union shows their true intentions. This is, according to the self-appointed spokesmen of the low-intelligence groups in our society, right out disgusting that we don’t get a new vote about joining the european common currency (the euro). The current situation limits Denmark and since all polls shows that 4 out of 10 danes prefer the euro, there is no reason to delay it. Just today, these anti-democratic ideas are made by the National Fuehrer of the Europe-movement, Erik Boel. Well, they don’t use the term fuehrer, but it is quite appropriate. Of course, real democracy allows him to have his own opinion, alongside his no doubt hundreds of likeminded people in his movement. But it shows a total lack of respect for democracy to want a vote about joining the euro. Erik Shovel, we did vote. In theory, we voted about it twice. Isn’t that enough? Do you insist on mocking this democratic proces because you are stupid, because you are truly evil, or because you generally disrespect all decisions made by democratic votes? I see no other options, and your lack of respect for the opinions for others is a little bit scary.
I don’t really have the right to call you neither stupid nor evil, since I do not know you (and I have no wish to know you). But I do claim this right, since you by writing to papers and the like, mock my democratic rights, and express contempt for my democratic decisions. Where is the line you should not cross? In earlier days, a few years ago, our politicians said we sent soldiers to Afghanistan to help them form a democracy. Do we call in the army to stop you too? Should we force you to respect democracy?
Of course we shouldn’t, but when a marginalized extremist-organization mocks the danish democracy, a part of my rights are to be allowed to talk back and mock that very same organization. Which I am doing right now.
Erik Shovel : If you are so keen on a new vote about the euro, couldn’t you explain to us what, seen from a democratic point of view, justifies a new vote? And if this very same justification will be justification enough for a new vote, in case of a yes to the euro? I mean, if X is the reason we need to vote again, and a majority votes yes due to X, would you also demand a new vote next time X occurs? No, I thought not. Democracy is, in the eyes of these democracy-hating extremist-organizations, only useful until you reach your goal, after that there is no real need for democracy ever again. Which brings memories back of a man who in the 30’s won an election (I forgot the name, but I seem to recall it was in Germany), whereafter free elections were no longer needed, since this man had gained all he could from democracy.
I certainly don’t compare Erik Shovel with this man, who was able to seduce an entire nation, but I do compare their respective lack of respect for democracy.