Niels Holck igen

Så blev det afgjort, Niels Holck skal ikke til Indien i denne omgang. Igen kan børn se at forbrydelser betaler sig, det skal bare ikke gå ud over rigtige mennesker. Så længe det kun er små brune mennesker, som inderne, det går ud over, så er det helt ok, de kunne jo bare være hvide istedet hvis de vil noget!

 Der er risiko for at menneskerettighederne ikke bliver overholdt, og der er ingen kontrol af hvordan fanger behandles. I sig selv 2 gode argumenter for at beholde Niels Holck i landet. Der er så bare en enkelt lille detalje….Hvorfor i alverdens riger og lande tager man mere hensyn til menneskerettighederne for Niels Holck, end for retfærdighed???? Han har tilstået! Han er ikke anklaget, han er skyldig! Er det fordi det er en menneskerettighed at skaffe 4 tons våben til en religiøs gruppe? Hvad er det for et retssystem der lader en våbensmugler gå frit rundt, og undlader at straffe ham medmindre det land der led under hans gerninger lover at behandle ham som med fløjlshandsker? Menneskerettigheder er vigtige, ja, men det er retfærdighed altså også. Lad nu uslinge som Niels Holck stå til ansvar for sine gerninger, istedet for at trække sager i langdrag på denne måde. Igen i denne sag ser man at gerningsmanden skal have bedre rettigheder end offeret.

En strøtanke : Hvad hvis det var et medlem af HA eller Bandidos der havde smuglet våben? Ville det også være blevet taget med et skuldertræk? Herhjemme får man minimum et års fængsel for at have et skarpladt våben, men hvis man smider 4 tons våben og ammunition ned til religiøse grupper i udlandet er det helt ok?

.

.

.

Finally, no more waiting anxiously. Yet again we show our youth that crime does pay off. As long as there are no real humans (whites)  among the victims, just little brown ones (indians), there really hasn’t been a crime at all. And if the little brown ones feel cheated, they should have been born white.

There is a risk that Niels Holck’s human rights are not upheld, and there is no control for prisoners in India, in regards to how they are treated. Insofar 2 nice arguments to keep Niels Holck in Denmark….Except for one little, tiny detail : How on earth can the danish court think more of Niels Holck’s human rights than of justice???? He confessed! He isn’t accused, he is, by his own admission, guilty! Is it because it is considered a human right to drop 4 tons of arms and ammunition to religious groups abroad? What kind of a legal system lets an arms smuggler walk around free, making sure he isn’t punished unless the country suffering from his acts promises to treat him very well? Human rights are important, yes, but justice is quite important too. Let scumbags like Niels Holck face a trial for their crimes, instead of dragging cases like this on and on, thereby trying to ensure the criminal better rights than the victim(s).

As an afterthought : What would have happened if the arms smuggler was a member of Hells Angels or Bandidos? Would the legal system have reacted the same way? In Denmark, if you have a loaded firearm, you get at least one year in prison, but dropping 4 tons of those things is ok, as long as you do it abroad?

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.